Carbon pricing - pricing pollution

Can pricing pollution really be good for the economy?

Pollution

We asked a bunch of Canada’s top economists “Can pricing pollution really be good for the economy?” Here’s what they had to say. The answer might surprise you! Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Google+ Pinterest Digg Del StumbleUpon Tumblr Email Yahoo Mail Gmail Print Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Digg Del StumbleUpon Tumblr Print Email […]

Richard Lipsey picture - carbon pricing

5 Questions for Richard Lipsey: putting the market to work for the environment

Climate and Energy Pollution Water

“If you put two economists in a room, you get two opinions, unless one of them is Lord Keynes, in which case you get three.” So said Winston Churchill. So what happens when you put 12 leading economists in a room and ask them to focus on one of the biggest challenges of our time: […]

Canada can do better

Climate and Energy Pollution

This piece originally appeared in the January 2015 edition of Policy Options. Canadians enjoy an enviable standard of living, yet we can do even better. Putting ecofiscal policies in place are key to Canada improving its management of natural assets and ensuring sustained prosperity. Measurement is crucial for policy-makers: it helps identify gaps, as well […]

The sensible middle in the climate change debate: carbon pricing

The sensible middle in the climate change debate

Climate and Energy Pollution

This Economy Lab, Report on Business piece by Chris Ragan originally appeared in the Globe and Mail on December 30, 2014 An overwhelming scientific consensus holds that the rising atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases is changing the global climate and presenting humanity with enormous challenges. This consensus also holds that climate change is largely driven […]

Polluter Pay, Not Tax Cuts

Pollution

Check out Andrew Jackson’s full article and Chris Ragan’s response. Progressives will welcome the launch of the Commission, which has put polluter pay squarely at the heart of the policy agenda, and may break a taboo when it comes to talking about pricing carbon. But the first discussion paper shows excessive faith in the power […]

Send this to friend